I’m dealing with a little foot injury right now, and after a huge block of consistent training I struggled at first with having to take some time off. But a few things have helped me become more relaxed about this otherwise undesirable necessity.

1) The weather Winter training is always accompanied by a compulsive checking of the Environment Canada weather service, anticipating how cold it’s going to be today, tomorrow, for the rest of the week. Since you have to adapt your training to fit the conditions (e.g. no speed work when the sidewalks are skating rinks) it’s vital to stay up-to-date on the changing forecasts. Funnily this preoccupation with the weather is the same when I’m not running. It’s a case of fear-of-missing-out. If the weather is terrible I don’t feel like I’m missing out on some really great, inspiring runs; I’m only avoiding some tough, possibly miserable, probably unpleasant ones. Sometimes these can turn out to be inspiring workouts in their own way, but there’s some comfort in knowing that I’m not missing an amazing trail run at dawn in beautiful spring conditions.

2) Alternatives When my training volume increases I sometimes feel a bit of anxiety about how all-consuming it becomes. While the time requirements of a mileage increase alone aren’t huge, it also comes with an increase in the auxiliary exercises like food preparation, stretching, strengthening, foam rolling etc. Other self-development projects can easily get pushed aside, and being able to once again pursue these in earnest is a nice side-effect of this involuntary running break. I’ve been meditating and working on yoga poses every day, learning to code (better) in Python, writing and reading more. It’s a more balanced existence, where my life isn’t focused entirely on improving one thing.

3) Rest Coming off some huge mileage weeks, I’m confident that a small break from running is in my best interest. I may lose a little bit of that hard-earned fitness, but I have no doubt this will be made up for in the mental and physical freshness I’ll have when I come back. Slogging through some big weeks in less than ideal conditions can take it’s toll on my desire to run. Some cold, dark, snowy, windy mornings I’ve needed a concerted exertion of willpower and contemplation of my long-term goals to get me out the door. Nothing lights up my enthusiasm for running like not being able to run. Can’t having something always makes us want it more.

4) Perspective My recent thoughts on this warrant their own post, but I’ll sum them up in a paragraph. Taking a broader perspective always calms my anxiety, whether about training related things, job stress or anything else. This past week I’ve started every day with an assessment of my foot. How much does it hurt? Is it better than yesterday? Can I run today? If I let them, these become the most important questions I face every morning; and if I let them, they would overshadow the rest of my life. They could easily run amuck as I worry and obsess over the uncertainty about how long I’ll need to take off. Stepping back to see just how narrow that focus is snaps me back to reality. This injury will not matter much when it comes to my whole life, and my life will matter even less when it comes to the whole world, and what does the whole world matter when you think about the universe? And what if there are infinite universes? There is no end to the insignificance of this one thing in my life that I’m letting overrun my brain. On a recent road trip we listened to a podcast with an astronomer, and the discussion about questions of civilizations, infinities and alternate universes reminded me of how comforting our insignificance can be, and how important it is to maintain the right level of perspective.

Portland Marathon

I’m running the Portland marathon tomorrow, and much like the Boston marathon earlier in the year I am woefully under-prepared. That’s ok – I signed up on a whim after noticing that we would be arriving in Portland for our vacation the day before. I couldn’t really not do it, could I? I would be in Portland for the marathon, when would such a serendipitous confluence of circumstances happen again? Never, probably. Thus I had to sign up, even if my piriformis is currently like a rusty piece of barbed wire sawing against my sciatic nerve. Ok, maybe not that bad, especially with the copious amounts of stretching, foam rolling, and core work I’ve been doing recently. When you replace 8 hours a week of running with stretching and planks you get limber pretty fast. And also sweet, sweet abs (that’s partially a lie, my abs aren’t exceptional.)

little muscle, big pain

Alas the piriformis is an elusive muscle, all tucked away deep in the glute, and my attempts to subdue it have been only moderately successful. I’ve laid off the running for the past couple of weeks, so it will be a surprise how I’m going to feel toeing the line tomorrow. Everyone likes surprises…

We’re not getting into Portland in time for the expo. Luckily my sister has an illustrious history on the west coast, habitating in such cities as Eugene, Portland, Bellingham, Seattle and Arlington, and one of her friends doing the race graciously agreed to pick up our race kits for us. This was crucial because there is no race-day pick up. I’m slightly bummed that we don’t happen to arrive in time for the expo; it’s part of the fun lead-up to a marathon, plus I love browsing/shopping for running gear.

Even though I’m not in tip-top shape for this (is that starting to be a trend?) I’m still pretty excited. Marathons are fun, especially if you’re not particularly concerned with how speedily you’re moving. Plus look at the legend for the course map. I love a legend that includes gummi bears, pretzels, and a brewery. Although my hopes for a late-in-the-race brewery-sponsored aid station were not to be; the race barely goes by it, and at mile 13 no less. I’m just not confident enough in my current running abilities to justify beer-drinking anywhere before mile 20. Screen Shot 2014-10-04 at 5.45.09 AM

The elevation profile looks fun – a couple sizeable hills, and pretty much coasting downhill from mile 17 onwards. Piece of cake. That’s what I’m telling myself, and my delinquent piriformis.

wow much elevation so downhill

Sadly Big A likely won’t be running much of the race with me. That achilles of his, while exquisitely crafted like a fine porcelain figurine, also seems to have the fragility of a fine porcelain figurine. The first 5 miles of the course are an out-an-back, so there’s the possibility of starting at least, without the risk of a long, hobbled walk back to the start.

But between now and then I’ve got some packing and a half-day of travel. I know I’m hugely fortunate to have been born in the late 20th century and not some earlier time where I might have died some horrible death before making it to age thirty, but I’m also kind of envious of people who will be born into the age of teleportation, which I assume based on star trek is an inevitability.

To finish on a positive note, the weather here is currently of the cold, wind-howling, rain-pouring variety. And in Portland?

Screen Shot 2014-10-04 at 5.59.53 AM

Ironman 2.0

In the fall of 2009 I tackled my first Ironman distance triathlon in Florida, followed a week later by a half-ironman. Because hey, I was in Florida already, and I’ve never been one to turn down a convenient opportunity to race. The ironman didn’t go especially well, but the half in Clearwater was a blast and I pulled off a decent race. In the aftermath of this training season I was more than happy to retire my tri bike for a few months, instead giving my running shoes some much-needed love and attention. On the heels of a few warm weather races I was actually looking forward to the upcoming winter months – I’d had my fill of the heat and would happily take the cold and snow over some of the grim, overheated and dehydrated training sessions of the past summer. At that point it was a decision to focus on running for a year, and come back to triathlon as a stronger runner. It didn’t quite go that way. I found contentment in just running, and never had a strong desire to do another tri. This was about how it went:

2009 – Rhode Island 70.3, Muskoka 70.3, Ironman Florida, Clearwater 70.3

2010 – Registered for Boston, overdid it on Pfitzinger’s training plan and wound up with a stress fracture in one femur and a stress reaction in the other. Cue 6 weeks sans running and a gradual return by the start of summer. Then a friend mentions he’s doing the JFK 50 miler, and would I like to join? I didn’t have to think about that one for very long, I really can’t say no to a trail run. Signing up for this ultra was like a gateway drug, leading to an autumn chock-full of racing: Vulture Bait 50K, Run for the Toad 50K, Horror Hill 6hr, Back-to-back marathons (Indianapolis and Huntington) and finally JFK. You’d think so much running would drive me back into triathlon’s welcoming embrace, but this was not the case. Boston had been deferred, it was the end of November and…

2011 – Remember last year when I went all-out with Pfitzinger and fractured the hell out of my femurs? No risk of that happening the second time around. I ran… sporadically. It was a consequence of my A-race occurring so late in the year, coupled with some lingering worries that I may have re-injured my femur. I took 6 weeks off to be safe, putting the start of Boston training smack dab in the heart of winter. Motivation was low to nonexistent. I did some indoor cycling and a handful of runs, maxing out at 10 miles. Goals for Boston were more in terms of high-five counts than mile splits. And on that account I pretty much nailed it. Came in under 4 hours too – not too shabby. I returned to running, eagerly signed up for Vulture Bait and Toad, took a trip out west to visit my sister and foolishly only brought new balance minimus shoes, consequently developed an IT band problem, and ran neither.

2012 – First race of the year was a 6 hour race in Buffalo on a whim, ran 29 miles. A week later Bear Mountain marathon, a challenging dance over rocks and through mud. And I think that was it for races that year.

2013 – Toledo marathon in the spring. I put in some solid if haphazard and unstructured training for that one. It wasn’t a great day – a gentle mist on race morning transformed into a torrential downpour and the cold became a real issue. I’ve never been great with in-race nutrition and it doesn’t help when my hands have the dexterity frozen out of them so that I can’t open any wrappers.

That fall was Grand Rapids, coinciding with the 5 year anniversary of my first marathon, also at Grand Rapids. I had a great summer of Pfitzinger training and was geared up to race. I signed up for a 6 hr race , the Toad 50K, Grand Rapids Marathon, and a local half. Maybe a bit too much to take on at the time; I went into Grand Rapids slightly worse for wear. The first half went decently, but I could feel myself fading; a creeping feeling that I wouldn’t be able to keep this up for very much longer. Some pains set in, nagging little issues flared up and forced me into some walking breaks, and my average pace plummeted. Fatigue set in (probably owing to my shitty race nutrition. If things are going well I could run a marathon on three Clif Bloks and a few sips of gatorade, but that wasn’t a things-are-going-well kind of day.) Suddenly I was in a “get to the end without walking too much” state, and crossed the finish line in a mediocre 3:36. If I was disappointed at all, this was quickly remedied by the awesome food and beer consumed in the aftermath. Grand Rapids Brewing Company, Founders, Wolfgang’s for breakfast… and we probably didn’t even scratch the surface of food and drink purveyors in that town.


2014 – I don’t know what we Northeasterners collectively did do deserve the winter we just had, but it must have been bad. Really bad. The snow, ice, wind and intense cold were relentless. So many weekends I’d work up the motivation to jumpstart my Boston training, only to wake up at 5am on Monday morning facing the pitch-black, -30 degree, 2 ft of fresh snow that was “the outdoors”. My motivation to run would evaporate. I always put out two sets of clothes in the morning just in case – one set with my running tights, jacket etc, and one with gym clothes. And it was never hard to talk myself out of a run and into a nice hot, sweaty gym workout. I put on a noticeable amount of muscle over the winter, and went into Boston about 10 lbs heavier than my usual marathon-running weight. Just as in 2011, my expectations were low and I set out to enjoy the day and make the most of it. That wasn’t hard with the great weather and amazing crowd support. What I lacked in endurance training I made up for in smiles and high-fives. I even high-fived a dog, and mini high-fived a baby with two of my fingers as her mother held her hand out. The strength and high-intensity training I’d done over the winter transferred to marathoning more than I could have hoped, and I kept up a solid pace around 8-minute miles for the whole race, finishing in 3:33. I would have been happy just breaking 4 hours, so I was super pleased with 3:33. It was such a great experience, a really perfect day, and it did so much to rekindle my desire to run. The moment I finished I wanted to sign up for next year.


And since then it’s been a build-up of my desire to take a more serious approach to training. There was a trip to Sedona and some awe-inspiring trail runs:


A week in Bermuda for work, including a sprint triathlon the day after I arrived, a swim in the ocean that was pure joy, tagging along for a ride around the island with some strangers, and fitting in some hot, sweaty runs wherever I could:

bermudaAnd weekends spent running and cycling, eating and drinking, exploring and getting lost on unfamiliar roads, attempting a 130km bike ride I was wholly unprepared for, and letting my training be dictated by opportunities and guided by feel.

Then a few weeks ago there was news of a full Ironman in Muskoka. Muskoka, where I had a great race on a beautiful course and qualified for Clearwater. Close to home as far as ironmans go, with a challenging bike that plays to my strengths (I love me some hills) … it wasn’t a difficult decision. I threw my $700 down without hesitation, and just like I’ve got my second ironman on the calendar, with a year to prepare. A year which I dearly need. I’ll need that year to build back my cycling base, learn how to feed myself properly in a race, and re-learn how to run off the bike. I’ll join a group, get myself properly fitted on my bike, clean up my diet, and follow a proper training plan. All pretty basic stuff that in the arrogance of my youth I thought I didn’t need. I may have been able to get by without some of those things before, but getting by isn’t the same as excelling, and adequate doesn’t come close to optimal.

I’m excited! About triathlons! I listened to Chrissie Wellington’s A Life Without Limits, bought some training books (Joe Friel’s Going Long is my favourite so far), subscribed to Triathlete magazine and am following a bunch of triathlon blogs. 371 days to go!


But then again…

Easier said than done.  My attempts to breathe life into my running motivation have failed.  What it really comes down to is the fact that I’m currently loving my gym workouts, while running – not so much.  I had a good 13-mile run last Sunday; it was cold and windy, but the sun was out in full force which easily makes up for freezing temps.  I’ll take whatever sunlight I can get – my skin these days is at best ghostly, at worst translucent.  

But alas it looks like that 13-miler may be the totality of my running for this week.  Another bout of polar-vortex weather has made venturing outside for any reason unpleasant. Instead I’ve had a good week of weight-training, including a lower body workout today that left my legs all jello-y.  The high-intensity, effort-to-failure of lifting is refreshing after the months of high-mileage running I did last year.  And I’m getting sucked into the gym culture – five different kinds of protein powder grace my cupboards, and my chrome tabs are increasingly populated with articles.  I’m learning about the plethora of ways you can squeeze out more work from your muscles – supersets, drop sets, rest-pause sets, German volume.  Like I said, I’m loving the weight-lifting right now, and who am I to argue with my own preferences?  The day will come when I run Boston (or any other marathon for that matter) all-out and see what I can do, it just won’t be this year.  I’m hoping I can leverage my newfound strength into a great summer of triathlon training.

Speaking of protein powder, I’ve discovered my new favourite dessert after purchasing some graham cracker flavoured muscle milk:


Costco cheesecake – frozen cherries, greek yogurt and muscle milk graham cracker crumble.

Simple and delicious – frozen cherries, greek yogurt and protein powder.  I mix a little water into the protein powder to give it a crumbly texture (otherwise you risk inhaling it – not in the good way).  

My workout from this morning:


  • 20 front squats with the bar to warm up
  • 4 x 10 @ 100



  • Warmup – 20 with bar, 20@60
  • 3 x 12 @ 80



GLUTE KICKBACK with Smith Machine

Boston Training

The calendar is inching toward Boston faster than I’d like.  11 weeks out and I’ve yet to make a concerted start at training.  Two main reasons for this:

  1. Winter. To quote Bart Simpson, “I didn’t think it was physically possible, but this both sucks and blows.”  Polar vortex cold, regular cold, snow, snow with wind, more snow, more wind, lots more snow.  We’ve had it easy in previous years, and it’s taken a while to adjust.  But I think we’ve all been sufficiently hardened by January’s weather.  -10° C feels like a resplendent gift from the gods now.
  2. I recently had the opportunity to purchase a one-year gym membership using a corporate discount.  We have a small gym in our condo building, but I haven’t belonged to a commercial gym in years. It’s been quite enjoyable to get back into lifting weights, and it’s an appealing alternative to a frustrating 10 min/mile run through unplowed sidewalks in bone-chilling temps.

Unfortunately neither the weather nor my inclinations have the slightest regard for my goals, commitments, or the steep, non-refundable marathon registration fee.  Pfitzinger has a 12-week training progam, so last week I mustered up some motivation to get out for a few mid-length runs.  Took advantage of some mild but snowy conditions at the end of the week to get 8 and 11 mile runs in on Thursday and Friday, respectively.  Saturday lifted some weights, and then watched in disappointment as it proceeded to snow ALL DAY LONG.  All day.  No breaks. So much snow.


Thankfully it had stopped snowing by Sunday morning, and I headed out for a respectable 15.5 miles.  I like to think that winter miles always count for more than summer miles.  I especially like to think this as I’m huffing and puffing along at 12-minute mile pace in calf-deep snow.

Geesies over Columbia Lake

Geesies over Columbia Lake

I’m trying a strategy I heard recently on a podcast with Matt Fitzgerald: embrace the suckiness of winter.  Taking pride in getting out the door on a -30° day, when there’s a bajillion metric tons of snow, or the sidewalks are treacherous icy death-traps.  Re-framing it as a challenge and a success to be out there on those dark, cold days at 6 am, when there’s nary another soul to be seen.  Seeking out and relishing mornings that are particularly harsh, rather than avoiding them.  Sounds like a good plan; otherwise it’s all too easy to let a bad winter wear you down, and all too easy to become comfortable using “it’s too cold” as an excuse not to run.

This week in running – Aug 12-18

Distance – 83 miles

Time – 12 hr 14m

Key runs – First tempo since getting back from vacation.  Not terrible considering that I consumed my weight in craft beer and Farm Burgers while down in Asheville.  6 miles averaging 7:26.  More marathon pace than LT, but I’ll take it.  An ill-conceived mid-run decision to modify my Wednesday out-and-back medium long run into a loop resulted in an impromptu 20-miler.  And my long run today was a warm one, taking big A on one of my favourite KW routes up through the university of Waterloo, Columbia Lake, Laurel Creek, along the rolling hills of Wilmot line, and back via the Boardwalk and Monarch Woods.

Highlights – Saturday we did our usual destination run from the car, this time going back to the Grand River Trail at Freeport. We did this run our first weekend in KW, but only six miles.  This time we continued on to Kuntz Park where we stopped to check out the historic site with some really old graves.   This section of the trail is beautiful, with some nice views of the river and a few rocky sections that make it feel more like a bona-fide trail run.  I’m not going to lie though, I do love the perfectly groomed crushed gravel paths that make up most of the GRT.





Learning to love natto

In recent years I’ve experimented with different ways of eating – vegetarian/vegan, gluten-free, paleo.  And while the gluten-free thing I’m going to try to stick with, what is increasingly making the most sense is to have a diet that is widely inclusive.  There’s a hypothesis called the triage theory of aging, which reasons that when the body is facing micronutrient deficiencies, it will sacrifice processes that support longevity in order to prevent acute deficiency symptoms.  If these deficiencies are short-term, this is likely not problematic.  But if you’re chronically deficient in a micronutrient, this theory posits that your body will consistently shut down processes that contribute to long-term health in order to carry out those that are necessary to keep you alive day-to-day.   Few people these days suffer from acute vitamin D deficiency (i.e. rickets),  but it could be that many people don’t have levels that are optimal for long-term disease protection.

Eating a wide variety of natural unprocessed foods seems to be the way to go.  Luckily I’m quite fond of food, plants and animals both.      It’s rare that I encounter something that I hear is very healthful that is also distasteful.  But one such food is natto.

I learned about natto from the book “Vitamin K2 and the Calcium Paradox” by Kate Rheaume B.  It’s a well-written book, not heavy on the science but not so simplistic that it feels condescending, like some science-for-the-nonscientist books can be.   I’d heard about K2 prior to reading this book mostly from internet-readings related to the Weston A. Price foundation.  During his world-wide adventures chronicling the health of various aboriginal peoples, he discovered a correlation between a nutrient he termed the “X factor”, and the healthy, normal development of bones, teeth and facial structures.  This X factor was found in things like egg yolks and grass-fed butter.

Later it became clear that the X factor was in fact Vitamin K2, a little-known vitamin overshadowed by it’s more famous sibling, Vitamin K1.  The greater awareness of K1 is due to the salience of its deficiency syndromes – K1 is vital for proper blood clotting, and if you’re acutely deficient, you’ll know it.   With vitamin K2, you may be deficient your whole life and be none the wiser.  Disorders that could be caused by a lifelong K2 deficiency – osteoporosis and atherosclerosis primarily – are often attributed to other factors, like diet and exercise.

K2 indirectly activates enzymes that are responsible for transporting calcium in the body.  Specifically, it’s a cofactor for K-dependent carboxylase, which is itself an enzyme that alters the structure of two other enzymes: osteocalcin and matrix gla protein (MGP).  Osteocalcin draws calcium into bones and teeth, while MGP removes calcium from arteries and veins, where it can accumulate in  plaques.  Without K2, these proteins remain in their inactive (under carboxylated)  form, and calcium ends up in unwanted places (contributing to atherosclerosis) and not in the places we need it like bones (contributing to osteoporosis).

Luckily, K2 is found in delicious things like egg yolks, butter, and cheese.  But these foods have to come from animals well-fed with green plant matter; butter from grain-fed cows and eggs from grain-fed chickens are likely not rich sources of K2.   I do try to buy free-range eggs (though they rarely advertise the chicken’s diet) and grass-fed ghee, and I suppose that supplements are always an option.  But the book highlights the best dietary source of vitamin K2 – natto – accompanied by a rather descriptive passage about how terrible tasting/smelling/feeling it is.

Natto is fermented soybeans, along the same lines as miso, tempeh, and soy sauce, all of which have fairly distinctive flavors.  But Natto’s distinctiveness is on a whole other level.  It comes in smallish servings inside little styrofoam packages, with soy sauce and mustard as suggested condiments.  There are two things you notice about it before it even touches your tongue: the smell, and the stringiness.

Natto is fermented by a particular microorganism called natto bacillus.  Legend has it that natto was discovered when a group of soldiers, carrying soybeans in a straw sack, were ambushed, and forced to abandon their food sacks.  When they returned, the beans had been fermented by bacteria living within the straw.  But having no other food at hand, they were forced to eat it; and rather than being totally disgusting, they evidently found it quite agreeable, and thus natto was born.  There may be some truth to this story: natto bacillus is a strain of bacillus subtilis, which (according to wikipedia) is also known as grass or hay bacillus.

One of my coworkers spent a co-op term working in Japan, and one day at lunch I asked him if he had ever tried natto.  This led to a dialogue which ultimately culminated in the creation of  a Natto Challenge, in which he offered to bring some to work the next week for us to try.  So on the following Tuesday we had three little styrofoam containers of the stuff in front of us.

First impressions as the protective wrapper was pulled away from the mass of natto were that it smells awful, and kind of resembles rice krispie squares.   The latter owing to the extreme stringiness of whatever starchy byproduct of the fermentation process holds the beans together.  It was seemingly impossibly to get some natto onto your utensil and up to your mouth without a few string clinging in an unsightly manner to your face.

I’m not going to lie, I found it fairly unpleasant at first.  And adding the sauce and mustard didn’t help much.  And disappointingly, the taste seemed to get worse the more you ate, not better.   As the coop student sitting beside me finished his portion, I was determined to choke down every last bean of my own, though it required a large glass of water and some duck-like swallowing maneuvers to do so.

It seems some people have a natural taste for it, enjoying it daily with rice as a breakfast food.  I wouldn’t go so far as to say I had a natural taste for it, but I didn’t find it quite as repulsive as I had anticipated.  It wasn’t tasty, and I would say it had a slight unpleasant taste.  But the unpleasantness is mild and not overpowering.    By itself, it’s not something I would want to eat with any frequency.  But its mildness leads me to believe that when paired with stronger (and more tasty) flavors, it could become something I wouldn’t mind eating for health purposes.  I’ve read that you can trick yourself into developing a taste for initially unpleasant flavours (like the bitter tastes of coffee or beer) by associating them with calorically dense meals.  Your brain is like “Hey, this taste means I’m going to get lots of calories – I’m going to make you like it so that you’re more likely to seek it out”, or something like that.

Thus today was Natto Challenge day 2, and I must say it was a success.   Big A and I have had a new favorite snack of late, thanks to the appearance of conveniently packaged seaweed snacks at Costco.  We take some rice, add a sliced avocado, crumble some seaweed sheets into it, and finish it off with a splash of soy sauce.  It’s like deconstructed vegetarian sushi, and it’s super tasty.  I decided these strong flavors might mesh well with the mild natto taste.  So I mixed some natto in with warm rice, tossed in the other ingredients and voila:
  It wasn’t bad.  The characteristic natto flavor was really subtle.  Granted it wasn’t as tasty as our original natto-free version of this snack, but it was still good.  I’ll definitely eat it this way again.  I’m curious to see if natto could be worked into a sweet dish as well, or maybe pureed and used in something like pancakes.
And just in case Operation: like natto doesn’t succeed, I’ve ordered some K2 supplements from my favorite online health store,


A few weeks ago B&N – who have generously been allowing me to inhabit their home for the past three months – received a velomobile to try out.  What’s a velomobile you ask?  No need to reach for google, here’s the awesome video they made.  I have a couple of brief appearances in an ill-fitting helmet that I unsuccessfully tried to put on over top of my winter hat.

Protein Fluff

Recently I discovered the magical art of making protein fluff.   I like having something sweet after dinner, which usually means something fruity, nutty, or chocolately.    I love this dessert for a number of reasons: it’s quick, simple and fun to make,  it contains protein and is satiating, and it’s really tasty.   Big A loves it too, and that’s always a bonus.   Without further ado, here’s the protocol:
You will need:
  • A large mixing bowl
  • One or two cups of frozen raspberries
  • A splash of milk
  • A potato masher, or failing that, a sturdy fork
  • One or two scoops of protein powder
  • Electric beaters or a stand mixer
  1. In a large bowl, combine several cups of frozen raspberries and enough milk to facilitate mashing.  Despite never measuring the relative quantities of raspberries, milk and protein I use, the fluff consistently turns out the same.
  2. With a potato masher or other mashing device, pulverize the raspberries until they more resemble red goo than fruit.
  3. Add in a couple scoops of your favorite-tasting protein powder.  I use a whey protein powder from Costco that tastes pretty good, and its only offense is being sweetened with sucralose.   Hey, at least it’s not aspartame.
  4. Mix together the raspberry mash and the protein powder with a fork.
  5. Using a stand mixer or hand beaters, whip the mixture for at least 5 minutes.   If it’s too dry and the beaters are just moving stuff around rather than homogenizing it, add a bit more milk.  After a while it will turn pink and puff up to roughly twice its original volume.  I tend to just stop when I notice that the mixture changing colour or volume any longer.
  6. Consume the delicious concoction.  Leftovers can be frozen and briefly thawed, which turns it into a sorbet-like treat.

Warning: nerd content

Big A recently purchased a Playstation 3. At the time, I was largely indifferent – I didn’t have any particular yearning for a game system, but I wasn’t opposed to it.  Then one day big A came home after a run one night with Fallout 3,  a post-apocalyptic role-playing game about a kid who grows up in an underground vault.   It’s essentially a mini-world in which you can explore, talk to people, and mold your character into either an idolized hero or a hated villain, or anything in between.

I quickly grew to love this game, and played it extensively.  Now I’m on to the sequel, Fallout: New Vegas.  Similar game, but the setting is the Mojave Desert instead of D.C.  This post is inspired by one particular quest which involved exploring a vault that has been overrun with mutant plants.   Vault scientists had been engineering plants that could survive in the wasteland with little water when their experiments went awry, producing giant killer venus fly traps and fungii whose spores turned humans into crazy green spore creatures.    Naturally.  Then a government scientists asks you to download the researchers’ data and return it to him, but along the way you meet another scientist who wants to destroy all the data so such monstrosities will never be created again.

The kind of person your character is – whether good or evil – is governed by your “karma”.  When you perform evil actions, like stealing or killing a good person, your karma goes down.   Karma-raising actions include saving people, giving them things, and generally helping other people out.  Oh, and killing bad people. No one likes bad people, but everyone looooves vigilante justice.

Ok, that’s a lot of context to get to the main point, which is that  this quest culminates with a choice: turn over the data and let it be erased, or lie to the scientist and tell her you don’t have it so that it can be saved.   I like to play these games by making the decisions that seem most right to me, and in this case that meant saving the researcher’s data and giving it to the other scientist.  And after clicking on that dialogue choice, the little “You’ve lost Karma ” icon appears in the upper left corner.

Really?  THAT was the evil action in this scenario?  Preserving the life’s work of some scientists, and the information they’ve uncovered, rather than destroying it and letting it go to waste?  Huh.

This subtle anti-genetic engineering sentiment got me to thinking about less subtle expressions that seem to pop up again and again in my explorations of the interwebs.  As I frequent food websites catered to vegan/organic/sustainable/whole foods, I naturally come across many articles (mostly with a negative spin) about genetically engineered foods.  And I’m continually perplexed as to why sustainable agriculture and GE are portrayed as mutually exclusive, rather than the one being a valuable tool for the other.

I’m neither biologist nor geneticist, so I’m cautious to speak authoritatively on the subject, but I have acquired some scientific training in my many, many years of post-secondary education.  In my understanding, agriculture is just bad.  It uses land, and fossil fuels, and produces waste.   When it comes to sustainable agriculture, less is more.  As in energy production and consumption, conservation in a win-win policy – you find ways to use less, which reduces the demand for energy production, and saves the consumer money.

In agriculture, there seems to me two prominent ways to do more with less.  The first is to reduce food waste, which is appallingly extensive (for a well-documented and entertaining account of food waste at all levels of production and consumption, read Waste: Uncovering the Global Food Scandal ).  The second is with genetic engineering.  If we can engineer plants to produce more edible product with less land and fertilizer, or engineer them to withstand harsh weather conditions, or contain more nutrients, or be naturally resistant to insects or disease … isn’t that awesome, and something we should encourage?

So why do environmentally-minded people oppose it so strongly?  The majority of comments I’ve seen bring up Monsanto, or how they are “new” foods and we don’t know their effect on the environment or human health, or that it is “creepy” to insert genes from one species into the genome of another.    Never any mention of GE’s potentialy to reduce agriculture’s impact on the environment, or address food security and health problems in developing countries.   And a lot of people who speak out about genetic engineering seem to lack some basic scientific understanding about what it actually entails, and how it differs from “traditional” hybridization and selection practices.

For species to evolve, they need new genes (or combinations of genes).  This happens naturally, at a slow rate, through mutations – errors in the copying of DNA during cell division.   When a favourable mutation helps an organism survive, it will ideally get passed on to its offspring, and the enhanced survival potential of all the organisms with the new gene allows it to proliferate within a population.  But this is a slow process, requiring many, many generations.  To speed things up, plants can be exposed to radiation to accelerate the rate of genetic mutations.  This is a widespread method, and in the last 30 years, upwards of 1700 crops have been improved by selecting beneficial radiation-induced mutations.

And I’ve not heard very many people speak out against this practice, which affects the entire genome of the plant.  My point is nicely expressed by this quotation:

“Radiation can affect a plant’s entire genome. Compared to these plants, genetically modified food is about as dangerous as a one-legged man in an ass-kicking contest.”

Jane Rissler of the Union of Concerned Scientists

Inducing mutations by irradiating plants and then selecting favourable outcomes seems like a haphazard approach compared with intentionally inserting selected genes.  It seems like both approaches introduce new genes into the plant – the difference with GE is that the new gene is not derived from a mutation of the plant’s own genome.  But what’s wrong with that?  Species share lots of genes, and even our genome consists of significant genetic material derived from virus.

In OAC biology, my sister and I were in the same class, and we worked together on a project about GE foods.   Of the countless high school projects I completed, this one I remember vividly.    I didn’t come across the ubiquitous anti-GMO nattering that’s around today; instead, I found lots of resources describing all the cool things scientists were doing with food.   The two big examples at the time were Bt corn and Golden Rice.   Bt corn borrows a gene from the soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis, allowing it to produce a substance that is toxic to European corn borers, a larvae that feeds on and destroys corn crops.  It’s the perfect solution to a pest problem – the toxin targets the bugs, but it’s harmless to humans and other creatures that happen to eat it.  And it ELIMINATES THE NEED FOR PESTICIDES (at least insomuch as it applies to that particular pest).  Pesticides are so deleterious – both to the environment and human health.  This was such an ingenious way to reduce pesticide use.  I loved it!

Then golden rice, scientists’ effort to alleviate Vitamin A deficiency in countries where rice is a staple food.  Rice is pretty devoid of essential nutrients, and vitamin A deficiency can lead to blindness.   Addressing these facts at the same time,  researchers used a gene from a soil bacterium and one from a daffodil to allow the rice plant to create proteins that complete the beta-carotene ( a precursor to Vit A) synthesis pathway.   The “golden rice” accumulated beta-carotene in its kernels, giving them a nice yellowy colour.  Again, what an ingenious way to combat a serious nutritional problem!  Once the seeds are given to farmers, there’s no extra cost to the community of producing the new rice.  So perfect!

As you can see, I think GE foods are really cool.  So anti-GMO talk from people who don’t seem to understand the science really riles me up.   I recently interacted with a few anti-GMO people on one of the blogs I frequent.   It was supremely frustrating – their view of GE foods seemed to derive entirely from information found in Food Inc., and a few seemed to  equate “GMO” with “Monsanto”.   Just because one company sells GE seeds, and also does some pretty terrible things,  doesn’t make the technology “evil” and “creepy”.  I’m pretty sure lots of pharmaceutical companies do terribly greedy things all the time, but that doesn’t mean the drugs they sell don’t help people.

It’s frustrating because these people with such strong sentiments about GE foods don’t take the time to learn the relevant science; and without knowing the science, how can you really be opposed to GE foods?  How can you be so vehemently against something that you don’t even understand?  I’m no microbiologist or a geneticist or anything remotely close, but there are loads of freely available resources where any intelligent person can learn about it.

Over dinner the other night, BigA and I were having an animated discussion about the failings of the educational system.   The point I was making was that the steadily increasing undergraduate enrollment rates most likely indicate a lot more people getting degrees that will be only marginally relevant to their future career.   There are a lot of people with history, English literature, politics and other assorted social science degrees that never really use the knowledge they learned during school.

BigA interjected that wait… it’s important to learn about history and politics!  Naturally I’m biased by my preference for scientific pursuits and my disdain for much of politics, but a lot of the really controversial issues these days are environmental, and hence science-based.  Climate change, nuclear power, stem-cell research, genetic engineering to name a few.  And how can you speak with confidence about these topics if you fail to understand the science?  I’d wager that there are far more prominent political issues where having scientific training would make you a better informed voter or discussant.  So if we have a lot of people going to university because they now have to in order to be competitive in the labour market, and they’re not learning anything they can apply to their future professions anyway… I say make undergraduate science mandatory.  It would certainly help clean some irrational clutter from the blogosphere at the very least.